Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303161›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

How to Evaluate and Adjust the Recommended Level of Physical Activity in Patients with Congenital Heart Diseases? A Practical Approach.

Dominika Filipiak-Strzecka, Ibadete Bytyçi, Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dominika Filipiak-StrzeckaDepartment of Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases of Adults, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5760-1243
Ibadete BytyçiMedical Faculty, University of Prishtina, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo.
Agata Bielecka-DabrowaDepartment of Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases of Adults, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), 93-338 Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prolongation of the lifespan of patients with congenital heart diseases (CHD) has caused them to experience symptoms and complications not only related to the defect itself or late complications of surgical treatment but also to be at risk of population diseases such as obesity or ischemic heart disease. As recently as two decades ago, fewer than one in five CHD patients received formal advice on physical activity. Once a patient has been thoroughly evaluated and the risk has been stratified, the clinician can develop a detailed and individualized exercise prescription. This prescription is a formal plan that specifies the recommended frequency, intensity, duration, and type of physical activity. The goal is to maximize the health benefits of exercise while minimizing any potential risks. Although the anatomical classification of the defect and the previously implemented method of treatment allow the estimation of the possible late complications to a certain extent, in reality, the clinical condition may vary significantly in individual cases. For this reason, we prepared a practical approach regarding physical activity in patients with CHD based on hemodynamic and electrophysiological parameters, instead of focusing solely on specific defects. We also paid attention to special CHD patient populations in which separate indications regarding physical activity must be implemented.

Indexed as

congenital heart diseasesexercise testingphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41303161
PMCPMC12653658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.