Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303502›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Neurodegeneration Through the Lens of Bioinformatics Approaches: Computational Mechanisms of Protein Misfolding.

Mubashir Hassan, Saba Shahzadi, Ahmed A Moustafa, Andrzej Kloczkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mubashir HassanThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Saba ShahzadiThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Ahmed A MoustafaSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4229, Australia.
Andrzej KloczkowskiThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-5095

Funding

NIH HHS 1R01HG012117-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein and peptide aggregation has become a prominent focus in biomedical research due to its critical role in the development of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) and its relevance to industrial applications. Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) are closely associated with abnormal aggregation processes, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of their molecular mechanisms. In recent years, a wide range of computational methods, bioinformatics tools, and curated databases have been developed to predict and analyze sequences and structures that are prone to aggregation. These in silico approaches offer valuable insights into the underlying principles of aggregation and contribute to the identification of potential therapeutic targets. This review provides a concise overview of the current bioinformatics resources and computational techniques available for studying protein and peptide aggregation, intending to guide future research efforts in the field of neurodegenerative disease modeling and drug discovery.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNeurodegenerative DiseasesProtein FoldingAnimalsHumansProtein AggregatesProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProtein Aggregatesbioinformaticscomputational methodsdatabasesneurodegenerative diseasesprotein aggregation

Identifiers

PMID41303502
PMCPMC12652096

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.