Evidence mapPaperPMID 41303575Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Modern Strategies for Osteoporosis Therapy: Current Status and Prospects for Targeted Intervention.

Vitalii Omelchenko, Vladimir Koval, Natalya Slazhneva, Natalya Bondarenko, Elizaveta Shatunova, Mariya Vorobyeva, Maxim Korolev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vitalii OmelchenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6606-7185
Vladimir KovalResearch Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology-Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia.ORCID 0009-0009-5363-8909
Natalya SlazhnevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8226-8996
Natalya BondarenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-656X
Elizaveta ShatunovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3634-5938
Mariya VorobyevaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5317-3288
Maxim KorolevResearch Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology-Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630117, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4890-0847

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-25-20111The Government of Novosibirsk Region agreement № r-81
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is becoming a "silent pandemic" because of its ever-increasing prevalence and the absence of clinical manifestations until a bone fracture happens. The purpose of this review is to summarize the actual data on the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and its treatment options. The disease develops through a multifactorial process involving an imbalance between bone remodeling and different factors like genetics, non-coding RNA regulation, osteoimmune dysregulation, oxidative stress, cellular senescence, and fat-bone interactions. Existing medications have beneficial effects by preserving and increasing bone density and reducing the risk of fractures. Among them, there are bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, calcitonin, estrogen-progestin therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and parathyroid hormone analogues. Otherwise, they suffer from certain disadvantages, such as adverse effects, including serious ones, and limitations associated with comorbidity. Targeting pathways underlying bone metabolism could significantly improve the therapeutic options and provide new tools in the fight against osteoporosis. We consider here targeted therapeutics that are already in clinical practice, as well as the most promising novel agents that are now under development: antibodies, siRNAs, aptamers, and small molecules.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisAnimalsBone DensityBone RemodelingDiphosphonatesHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesantibodiesantiosteoporotic drugsaptamersosteoporosispathogenesissiRNAssmall moleculestargeted inhibitiontherapyWNT pathway

Identifiers

PMID41303575
PMCPMC12652459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.