ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Modern Strategies for Osteoporosis Therapy: Current Status and Prospects for Targeted Intervention.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Food Supplement with Bio-Activated Silicium and Vitamins D3 and K2 in the Conservative Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multinomial risk modeling of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Iraqi women: comparative contributions of osteoprotegerin and vitamin D3.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- The cutting-edge advancements in biomaterials under the guidance of intelligence and bionics.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis is becoming a "silent pandemic" because of its ever-increasing prevalence and the absence of clinical manifestations until a bone fracture happens. The purpose of this review is to summarize the actual data on the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and its treatment options. The disease develops through a multifactorial process involving an imbalance between bone remodeling and different factors like genetics, non-coding RNA regulation, osteoimmune dysregulation, oxidative stress, cellular senescence, and fat-bone interactions. Existing medications have beneficial effects by preserving and increasing bone density and reducing the risk of fractures. Among them, there are bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, calcitonin, estrogen-progestin therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and parathyroid hormone analogues. Otherwise, they suffer from certain disadvantages, such as adverse effects, including serious ones, and limitations associated with comorbidity. Targeting pathways underlying bone metabolism could significantly improve the therapeutic options and provide new tools in the fight against osteoporosis. We consider here targeted therapeutics that are already in clinical practice, as well as the most promising novel agents that are now under development: antibodies, siRNAs, aptamers, and small molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.