ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Menopausal Hormone Therapy-Risks, Benefits and Emerging Options: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tiao-Jing-Cu-Yun Acupuncture combined with estradiol in the treatment of patients with thin endometrium undergoing hormone replacement therapy for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Transdermal 17β-Estradiol for the Treatment of COVID-19: Protocol of an Early Terminated Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Plant-based macronutrients and micronutrients in combating osteoporosis: research insights and molecular pathways.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Real-world safety profile of fezolinetant: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Hormone replacement therapy and its association with LATE-NC in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Effect of Preoperative Hormone Replacement Therapy on Postmenopausal Women Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repair.Cureus · 2026Article
- Comparison of two menopausal hormone therapy regimens in managing menopausal symptoms: a retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Transdermal Hormonal Therapy in Menopause: Current Evidence and Personalized Approaches.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Early in, early out: reproductive lifespan timing and cardiometabolic risk in women.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
- Optimizing the Management of Menopause-Related Chronic Diseases in Rural Settings: A Closed-Loop "Screening-Prevention-Treatment" Model to Promote Healthy Aging - A Descriptive Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to synthesize contemporary evidence on the benefits, risks, and emerging options in menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), emphasizing the recent literature. A narrative review of peer-reviewed studies and guidelines (up to September 2025) from major databases (e.g., MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted, with emphasis on the last five years and qualitative synthesis. MHT provides the most effective relief of vasomotor symptoms and is the first-line treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, particularly with the use of low-dose local vaginal estrogen preparations; it also prevents early postmenopausal bone loss and reduces fractures in selected cases. Cardiovascular prevention is not an indication. Benefit-risk depends on timing, route, and dose. Initiation within 10 years of menopause as well as the use of transdermal estradiol at low-moderate doses are favored when cardiometabolic or thrombotic risk is salient. In contrast, oral regimens-particularly those using conjugated equine estrogens-are associated with higher risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke compared with transdermal 17 β-estradiol, and risk also varies by the type of progestogen used. Effects on breast cancer risks are regimen-specific: neutral to favorable with estrogen-alone after hysterectomy, but increasing with longer use of combined therapy. While the absolute risk of ovarian cancer remains small, evidence for colorectal cancer remains mixed. MHT confers modest improvements in sleep, mood, intercourse, and quality of life. Estetrol (E4) shows anti-VMS efficacy at the minimum effective oral dose and favorable pharmacology, but conclusive data on its long-term cardiovascular, thrombotic, and breast safety are pending. MHT should be individualized appropriately based on the patient, timing, route, dose, and choice of progestogen. The lowest effective dose should be used, alongside periodically reassessing the therapy as new evidence, including emerging data on E4, emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.