Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41303580›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Menopausal Hormone Therapy-Risks, Benefits and Emerging Options: A Narrative Review.

Ana Maria Arnautu, Vanda Roxana Nimigean, Claudia Alexandra Nacea-Radu, Dana Mihaela Tilici, Diana Loreta Paun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Hormone replacement therapy and its association with LATE-NC in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Maria ArnautuEndocrinology Department, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Vanda Roxana NimigeanDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-7975
Claudia Alexandra Nacea-RaduEndocrinology Department, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Dana Mihaela TiliciEndocrinology Department, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-5655-2694
Diana Loreta PaunEndocrinology Department, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize contemporary evidence on the benefits, risks, and emerging options in menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), emphasizing the recent literature. A narrative review of peer-reviewed studies and guidelines (up to September 2025) from major databases (e.g., MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted, with emphasis on the last five years and qualitative synthesis. MHT provides the most effective relief of vasomotor symptoms and is the first-line treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, particularly with the use of low-dose local vaginal estrogen preparations; it also prevents early postmenopausal bone loss and reduces fractures in selected cases. Cardiovascular prevention is not an indication. Benefit-risk depends on timing, route, and dose. Initiation within 10 years of menopause as well as the use of transdermal estradiol at low-moderate doses are favored when cardiometabolic or thrombotic risk is salient. In contrast, oral regimens-particularly those using conjugated equine estrogens-are associated with higher risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke compared with transdermal 17 β-estradiol, and risk also varies by the type of progestogen used. Effects on breast cancer risks are regimen-specific: neutral to favorable with estrogen-alone after hysterectomy, but increasing with longer use of combined therapy. While the absolute risk of ovarian cancer remains small, evidence for colorectal cancer remains mixed. MHT confers modest improvements in sleep, mood, intercourse, and quality of life. Estetrol (E4) shows anti-VMS efficacy at the minimum effective oral dose and favorable pharmacology, but conclusive data on its long-term cardiovascular, thrombotic, and breast safety are pending. MHT should be individualized appropriately based on the patient, timing, route, dose, and choice of progestogen. The lowest effective dose should be used, alongside periodically reassessing the therapy as new evidence, including emerging data on E4, emerges.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyHormone Replacement TherapyMenopauseBreast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleHumansEstrogensestetrolhormone replacement therapymenopausal hormone therapypersonalized regimens

Identifiers

PMID41303580
PMCPMC12652300

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.