ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Copy Number Alteration Profiling from Plasma cfDNA WES in Advanced NSCLC.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsies for detection, characterization, and interception of therapy resistance in thoracic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing offers a minimally invasive approach for profiling tumor genomes, but detecting copy number alterations (CNAs) from cfDNA whole-exome sequencing (WES) remains technically challenging due to noise and guanine-cytosine (GC)-related bias. Building upon our previous study that characterized read count patterns in cfDNA WES data, we developed and evaluated an advanced pipeline for robust CNA detection in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Read count signals showed strong correlation with GC content, and applying locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS)-based GC bias correction effectively reduced false positives and improved CNA detection. The resulting cfDNA CNA profiles were reproducible within patients and showed strong concordance with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) tissue-level patterns for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). These findings demonstrate that cfDNA WES, when combined with appropriate bias correction, can serve as a practical and minimally invasive alternative for genomic characterization of NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.