ArticleToxics2025
Preliminary Identification of PFAS and Other Emerging Contaminants in the French Broad River, NC Post-Hurricane Helene.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hurricanes are increasingly impacting inland water systems, yet their role in mobilizing anthropogenic contaminants remains insufficiently characterized. This study presents a preliminary assessment of organic contaminant loading in the French Broad River, North Carolina, 15 days after flooding from Hurricane Helene. Surface water samples from five sites were analyzed using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Targeted analysis quantified 11 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), with summed concentrations ranging from 1.49 to 70.8 ng/L. One downstream site exhibited the highest burden, where PFOSs and PFOA exceeded U.S. EPA drinking water maximum contaminant levels. Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening identified 468 compounds, with 96 structurally annotated at high confidence. Of these, a large proportion were associated with medium to high hazard potential, particularly for acute aquatic toxicity (69%), developmental toxicity (64%), mutagenic genotoxicity (49%), endocrine disruption (35%), skin irritation (27%), eye irritation (26%), and carcinogenicity (17%). Four EPA priority pollutants-4-nitrophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, pentachlorophenol, and dibutyl phthalate-were also detected. Site-specific chemical profiles suggested inputs from flood-damaged wastewater infrastructure and plastic debris. These findings highlight the susceptibility of freshwater systems to contaminant mobilization during extreme flooding and demonstrate the value of combining NTA and cheminformatics for post-disaster monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.