ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Biodistribution and Toxicological Impact Assessment of Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Murine Models: A Systematic Review of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Studies.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity of nanostructures in drug delivery applications.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Nanosized Cerium Phosphate: Synthesis Methods, Morphology, and Potential Applications in Biomedicine.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Impact of hyperglycemia on glioblastoma cell proliferation and the therapeutic potential of green-synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Studying the Biological Activity of Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles Using Bacterial Biosensors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biological Applications of Functionalized Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Mitochondria-Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.