Evidence mapPaperPMID 41304824Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

The Convergence of Polymer Science and Predictive Modeling for Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring.

Ju-Hwan Lee, Hong-Sik Yun, Hee-Jae Jeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ju-Hwan LeeDepartment of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Sik YunDepartment of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Jae JeonDepartment of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-7793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global effort to manage diabetes effectively is driving continuous innovation in glucose monitoring devices. While current systems have improved patient care, persistent challenges with sensor stability and invasiveness highlight the need for advanced, patient-friendly technologies. A particularly promising frontier is emerging from the convergence of advanced polymer science and artificial intelligence (AI), opening new pathways for noninvasive biosensing. This feature review provides a comprehensive overview of polymer-based "hardware", such as molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), conductive polymer hydrogels (CPHs), and functional coatings, which offer robust and biocompatible alternatives to traditional enzyme-based sensors. Concurrently, we examine (AI) "software", including machine learning and predictive modeling, which enable reliable interpretation of complex biosignals for real-time glucose monitoring. Furthermore, this review highlights critical challenges in scalability, long-term in vivo stability, regulatory approval, and clinical adoption, while discussing strategies for successful translation into pharmaceutical technology and medical devices. By mapping the current landscape and future directions, this review aims to guide research toward the next generation of intelligent, patient-centric, noninvasive glucose monitoring platforms.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)blood glucose monitoringconductive polymer hydrogels (CPHs)machine learning (ML)molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)non-invasive sensorpredictive modelingwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID41304824
PMCPMC12655010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.