ArticleDigital health
Artificial intelligence for pediatric height prediction using large-scale longitudinal body composition data.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging AI solutions for sustainable practice in pediatric radiology: a practical guide and an educational tool.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We developed a precise, reliable artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting the future height of children and adolescents based on anthropometric and body composition data. Materials and Methods: We used an extensive longitudinal dataset from a large-scale Korean cohort study, which included 588,546 measurements from 96,485 children and adolescents aged 7-18. We developed a prediction model using the light gradient boosting method and integrated anthropometric and body composition metrics along with their standard deviation scores (SDSs) and velocity parameters. Model performance was assessed through root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). We employed Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) for model interpretability. Results: The model accurately predicted future heights. For males, the average RMSE, MAE, and MAPE were 2.51 cm, 1.74 cm, and 1.14%, respectively, with female prediction results showing comparable accuracy (2.28 cm, 1.68 cm, and 1.13%, respectively). Shapley additive explanations analysis revealed that the SDS of height, height velocity, and soft lean mass velocity were key predictors of future height. The model created personalized growth curves through estimation of individual-specific height trajectories, comparison with actual measurements, and identification of key variables using local SHAP values. Conclusion: Our model produces accurate and personalized growth curves, incorporating explainable AI techniques for enhanced clinical understanding. This method advances pediatric growth assessment and provides robust clinical decision support. Despite limitations including the absence of handwrist radiography comparison and Korean population specificity, our approach demonstrates significant potential for early identification of growth disorders and optimization of growth outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.