Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306381›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports

Clarifying blood-based brain-derived neurotrophic factor measurement in Alzheimer's disease research: A call for pre-analytic standardization.

Ted Ks Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ted Ks NgRush University Medical Center, Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7348-0410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study by Kueck et al. rigorously addresses the complex pre-analytical and biological confounds underlying blood-based brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) measurement in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. By directly comparing platelet-rich plasma and platelet-poor plasma, it distinguishes free-circulating from platelet-stored BDNF and their associations with core AD biomarkers. Findings support BDNF as a potential compensatory marker in early cognitive impairment and emphasize the critical need for biomarker-specific pre-analytic standardization protocols. This commentary contextualizes the work within existing inconsistencies and outlines key recommendations for standardizing blood-based BDNF measurements to ensure reproducibility, potential clinical utility, and translational relevance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasebiomarkerbrain-derived neurotrophic factormild cognitive impairmentprotocols

Identifiers

PMID41306381
PMCPMC12644425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.