Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41306441›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025

Association of hemodynamic variability during endovascular stroke treatment with functional outcome and parenchymal hemorrhage.

Min Chen, Lukas D Sauer, Arne Potreck, Meinhard Kieser, Martin Bendszus, Peter Ringleb, Markus Möhlenbruch, Silvia Schönenberger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04578288 (Individualized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Procedural Sedation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04578288 nacompletednot on this map

Individualized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Procedural Sedation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2020 to 2022Enrolled250ConditionsAcute Ischemic StrokeArmsINDIVIDUALIZED BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT DURING ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE UNDER PROCEDURAL SEDATION
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min ChenDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-9298
Lukas D SauerInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-9994
Arne PotreckDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Meinhard KieserInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-4333
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter RinglebDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5473-8671
Markus MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Silvia SchönenbergerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3348-6719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Higher blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke were shown to be associated with worse functional outcome and hemorrhagic transformation. Objectives: To assess the influence of blood pressure variability during endovascular stroke treatment on functional outcome and parenchymal hemorrhage. Design: We performed a post-hoc exploratory analysis of the individualized blood pressure management during endovascular thrombectomy under procedural sedation in acute ischemic stroke (INDIVIDUATE) study, which was a randomized clinical trial investigating an individualized blood pressure management strategy in comparison to a standardized treatment strategy during endovascular stroke treatment. Methods: Several BPV parameters, such as procedure time of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in a range of a preprocedural baseline SBP ± 10 mmHg and ±20 mmHg, maximal and minimal SBP, variance and average real variability of intraprocedural SBP values were tested for association with functional outcome and PH1/PH2 hemorrhages in the current post-hoc analysis. Results: Regression analyses were performed in 250 patients and revealed an association of variance of intraprocedural SBP (aOR, 1.002 (95% CI, 1.0004-1.004); Conclusion: In our study, intraprocedural BPV parameters during endovascular stroke treatment were positively associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Potential underlying mechanisms should be further explored to better understand the effects of hemodynamics during the hyperacute time frame of endovascular stroke therapy. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04578288.

Indexed as

blood pressure variabilityendovascular stroke treatmentperi-procedural management

Identifiers

PMID41306441
PMCPMC12644438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.