ArticleMolecular vision2025
Phenotype-genotype correlation of patients with congenital cataracts and hair anomalies.
Article in Molecular vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hair anomalies represent a common associated symptom of congenital cataracts. Early diagnosis is crucial for treatment and predicting prognosis. However, the insidious and nonspecific nature of the symptoms in young children makes diagnosis challenging, often necessitating tools such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) for accurate assessment. This study aims to propose a simple and expedient approach to guide clinical management by analyzing phenotype-genotype correlations. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among participants who underwent clinical examinations and WES between 2021 and 2023. Bioinformatic analysis was performed. In total, 170 unrelated congenital cataract probands were tested. The suspected pathogenic variants were validated through Sanger sequencing in both the probands and available family members. Correlation analyses were then performed, integrating clinical characteristics, cataract phenotype, and genotype data. Results: Nine probands presented with both cataracts and hair anomalies. Potential pathogenic variants were detected in all patients with hair anomalies, including a novel variant in Conclusions: We identified nine probands with hair anomalies in our large cohort of congenital cataract probands. Using WES and comprehensive clinical examinations, we established definitive diagnoses, broadened the phenotype and genotype, and proposed phenotype-genotype correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41306484PMC12645062What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.