ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Mooren's ulcer: a multifactorial autoimmune peripheral ulcerative keratitis and current treatment protocols.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral Mooren's Ulcer With Corneal Perforation in Two Women of Different Ethnicities: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2026Article
- Human Amniotic Membrane Dressing as a Non-Surgical Alternative for Extensive Chronic Ulcers: A Comparative Case Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Multimodal Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Subconjunctival Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Corneal Wound Healing After Chemical Injury: Impact on Epithelial Coverage, Limbal Ischemia, and Ocular Surface Inflammatory.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced Imaging of Ocular Surface Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mooren's Ulcer (MU) is a rare, chronic, and painful form of autoimmune peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK), with an elusive etiology and a risk of corneal perforation and vision loss. Despite numerous proposed triggers, including parasitic infections, hepatitis C virus, ocular trauma, and surgery, the pathogenesis of MU remains unclear, and diagnosis continues to rely heavily on exclusion. A key controversy in current clinical practice lies in the absence of standardized diagnostic criteria and consensus treatment protocols. This review addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive and structured diagnostic framework for MU, particularly emphasizing laboratory and immunological testing strategies to facilitate accurate differential diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first review to systematize these diagnostic components in detail. In addition to summarizing the latest findings on epidemiology, etiology, pathology, and classification, the work also review the evolving role of advanced imaging, histopathology, and tear-based markers in MU diagnosis and monitoring. Treatment options, ranging from immunosuppressive therapy to surgical intervention, are discussed based on disease severity. This work recommend a tiered, individualized approach to treatment and advocate for future multicenter studies to validate diagnostic protocols and establish evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.