ArticleFrontiers in bacteriology2025
Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant double-mutant heat-labile toxin derived from enterotoxigenic
Article in Frontiers in bacteriology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548064 (A Phase 1 Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Double Mutant Heat-Labile Toxin LTR192G/L211A), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1 Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Double Mutant Heat-Labile Toxin LTR192G/L211A (dmLT) From Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli (ETEC) by Oral, Sublingual, or Intradermal Vaccination in Adults Residing in an Endemic Area
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The case for evaluation of double mutant heat-labile toxin as an adjuvant to improve oral cholera vaccine immunogenicity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Review
- MVA-Spike encoding the A subunit of dmLT safely enhances systemic and mucosal immune responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- An Asset for Food Safety: The Knowledge Behind the Physiological Alterations Induced by ETEC Enterotoxins.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Enterotoxigenic Methods: Five cohorts of 15 participants each were enrolled and randomized 4:1 to receive vaccine dmLT or placebo (12 vaccine and 3 placebo recipients per cohort). The 3 oral or sublingual doses of 5 μg or 25 μg dmLT were administered 2 weeks apart; the 2 intradermal doses of 0.3 μg dmLT were administered 3 weeks apart. Safety was assessed by collecting solicited and unsolicited adverse events. The immune responses measured included dmLT-specific serum IgA and IgG, serum toxin neutralizing antibody, dmLT-specific IgA and IgG antibody secreting cells (ASC), and IgA and IgG antibodies in lymphocyte supernatant (ALS). Results: All doses of dmLT delivered by different routes were well tolerated; adverse events were few, mild, and transient. Serum, ALS, and ASC IgA and IgG responses, as well as LT neutralizing antibody responses, were greatest among recipients of 25 μg oral and 0.3 μg intradermal doses. In contrast, sublingual dosing induced modest responses; there was virtually no serum antibody response to 5 μg sublingual dose and only sporadic ALS and ASC responses with 5 μg and 25 μg doses. Discussion: In conclusion, dmLT was well tolerated, and immune responses were dependent on dmLT dose and route of administration. The encouraging tolerability and immunogenicity results further highlight dmLT's potential not only as a vaccine but also as an adjuvant as reported by others or as a candidate vaccine antigen. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03548064.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.