ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
A feasibility study on multimodal CT-MRI registration using segmentation aid and CoLlAGe feature extraction approach.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study proposes a framework to address the problem of multimodal MRI-to-CT image registration by incorporating feature-based registration approach and segmentation, focusing especially on liver-specific clinical applications.
methodsThe proposed framework consists of three key stages: (1) liver segmentation using pretrained nnU-Net models for both CT and MRI images, (2) CoLlAGe features extraction within the segmented liver regions to preserve spatial information of the region of interest (ROI), and (3) image registration based on these extracted features.
resultsAcross 24 pairs of registration from MRI to CT, most of the Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) results are close to 0 millimeters, and all Dice coefficients are greater than 0.8. The values of mean ± standard deviation show that the Dice coefficient is 0.921 ± 0.038, the ASSD is 0.086 ± 0.213 mm.
conclusionThese results demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework in the study of multimodal MR-to-CT registration. The precision of liver MR-to-CT registration is considered acceptable for liver surgical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307674What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.