SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
The Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Telecare Consultations Among Patients Who Have Experienced a Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurse-Led Tele-Education Improves Self-Efficacy and Reduces Stroke Readmissions: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Telemedicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurse-led telecare consultations have emerged as a promising approach for the long-term management of stroke survivors, particularly in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions. While several studies have explored its use, the effectiveness of nurse-led telecare consultations in post-acute stroke care remains unclear.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led telecare consultation for poststroke management among stroke survivors who were discharged from the hospital and lived in the community.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across 6 databases-CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL-for randomized controlled trials published from inception to February 2025. Included studies examined nurse-led telecare consultations compared to usual care among stroke survivors living in the community. Studies involving individuals who were hospitalized or institutionalized were excluded, along with reviews, abstracts without full texts, non-English or non-Chinese articles, and studies not meeting the criteria for randomized controlled trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included blood pressure (BP), psychological burden, quality of life, medication adherence, health care service use, stroke recurrence, survivor functioning, and coping. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using mean differences (MDs) or standardized MDs with 95% CIs under a random-effects model and dichotomous outcomes using odds ratios with 95% CIs via the Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-square test and I
resultsIn total, 9 studies involving 2524 participants were included. Ischemic stroke was the most common type (n=1568, 62.13%) of stroke. Meta-analysis showed that nurse-led telecare significantly increased the likelihood of achieving target BP (odds ratio 2.33, 95% CI: 1.83-2.98; P<.001). For continuous outcomes, pooled analyses showed nonsignificant but directionally favorable reductions in systolic BP (MD -4.83, 95% CI -12.51 to 2.85; I
conclusionsNurse-led telecare consultations may support better BP management and coping and reduce hospital readmissions among community-dwelling stroke survivors. However, the pooled effects for continuous outcomes were inconclusive, and heterogeneity remained high. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality trials with standardized outcome measures and longer-term follow-up are warranted to confirm effectiveness.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023492692; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023492692.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.