Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2025
Repeated Resistance Training Reveals the Reproducibility of Muscle Strength and Size Responses Within Individuals.
Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repeated Resistance Training Reveals the Reproducibility of Muscle Strength and Size Responses Within Individuals.European journal of sport science · 2025Trial
- Research into resistance training response heterogeneity: a summary of the 2025 conference at the University of Jyväskylä.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated whether the responses of upper and lower limb muscle strength and size to resistance training (RT) are reproducible across two RT periods. Untrained males and females (age 32 ± 5 years) were randomly assigned to RT (n = 20) or a control group (n = 27). The RT group completed two identical 10-week RT periods separated by 10 weeks of detraining. The control group underwent a 10-week non-RT period. Before and after each period, the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps brachii (BB) was measured by ultrasound. One-repetition maximum (1RM) was measured in leg press (LP) and biceps curl (BC). Minimal detectable changes were determined. The RT group showed greater gains (p < 0.001) in muscle size and strength than the control group, with variability observed among individual responses. The reproducibility of responses within-participants was demonstrated by correlations (p ≤ 0.001) between the first and second RT periods in VLCSA (r = 0.697), BBCSA (r = 0.761), and LP1RM (r = 0.671), with a trend for BC1RM (r = 0.393 and p = 0.095). Nonresponders were identified, but none were detected in both RT periods for more than one variable. First RT correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with subsequent detraining in BBCSA (r = -0.673) and LP1RM (r = -0.488), with a trend for VLCSA (r = -0.422 and p = 0.072). In conclusion, responses to RT are reproducible when RT is repeated, indicating that the individuality of the training response has a physiological origin. Nonresponsiveness is rare and should not be justified solely by one variable. Responses to detraining suggest that greater RT gains may also diminish faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.