Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41308007›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Monotherapy With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Alexander Lein, Thorsten Fuereder, Manuel Stoeth, Agmal Scherzad, Stephan Hackenberg, Julia Schnöll, Lorenz Kadletz-Wanke, Gregor Heiduschka, Archana Jaiswal, Rajiv Bhalla and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander LeinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-9837
Thorsten FuerederDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Manuel StoethDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8069-4342
Agmal ScherzadDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stephan HackenbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia SchnöllDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-4395
Lorenz Kadletz-WankeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor HeiduschkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Archana JaiswalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rajiv BhallaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Lukas KennerDepartment of Pathology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Faris F BrkicDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a rare malignancy with limited data on effective treatment modalities in the recurrent and/or metastatic (r/m) setting. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in treating head and neck cancers, in general, their effects in SNSCC remain poorly understood. Furthermore, SNSCC patients are frequently excluded from clinical trials, limiting the evidence base for ICI efficacy in this specific subgroup. Therefore, our study evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-agent ICI therapy in r/m SNSCC.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of all r/m SNSCC patients treated with single-agent ICIs from July 2018 to December 2023 at two tertiary reference centers.

resultsA total of 18 patients received either Pembrolizumab (n = 8) or Nivolumab (n = 10) for r/m SNSCC. The overall response rate (ORR) to immunotherapy was 11.1% (2/18), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 27.8% (5/18) and a mean PFS and OS of 11.7 (95% CI: 2.3-21.0) months and 18.9 (95% CI: 8.3-29.5) months respectively. Two (11.1%) immune-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. Univariable analysis revealed high pathological grading (p = 0.049) as a negative prognostic factor for PFS. In an exploratory comparison with a larger cohort of 121 patients with r/m SCC of the larynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or oral cavity receiving ICI therapy, outcomes in SNSCC appeared broadly similar, with no statistically significant differences in PFS (p = 0.153), OS (p = 0.152), ORR (p = 0.401), or DCR (p = 0.359).

conclusionImmunotherapy may represent a treatment option for patients with SNSCC. Given the limited sample size, these results should be interpreted with caution. Our findings highlight the urgent need to include SNSCC patients in future prospective trials to clarify the role of immunotherapy in this underrepresented population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabpembrolizumabadvanced diseasehead and neck cancerimmune‐checkpoint therapysinonasal squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41308007
PMCPMC12659764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.