Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309043›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2025

Beta-blocker use and survival outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rui Li, Jie Chen, Yingkai Chen, Kai Jin, Yong Chen, Changyu Deng, Xuefen Liu, Yue Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui LiDepartment of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Yingkai ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Kai JinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Yong ChenDepartment of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Changyu DengDepartment of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Xuefen LiuDepartment of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Cardiology, The People's Hospital of Rongchang District, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-3092-0905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the associations between beta-blocker use and survival outcomes, including cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, median overall survival, and median progression-free survival, in patients with colorectal cancer. The findings are intended to inform evidence-based strategies for optimizing adjuvant therapy in clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies assessing the effect of beta-blockers on survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Studies reporting hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, median overall survival, or median progression-free survival were included. Adjusted hazard ratios were pooled using meta-analytic techniques. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity and assess result robustness.ResultsOverall, 13 high-quality cohort studies including >93,000 patients with colorectal cancer were included. Beta-blocker use was marginally associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.00), with a more pronounced effect among patients who had not undergone surgery (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.98). Although no overall association was observed for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 0.76), a significant reduction was noted in the subgroup that underwent curative surgery (hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.00). Among patients receiving bevacizumab, beta-blocker use was linked to improved median overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.87), whereas a nonsignificant trend toward improved median progression-free survival was observed (hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.05). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness and consistency of the pooled results.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that beta-blocker use is significantly associated with a reduced risk of cancer-specific mortality in patients with colorectal cancer, with the most pronounced benefit observed among those who did not undergo surgery. Additionally, patients undergoing radical resection or bevacizumab-based therapy may also experience improved survival with beta-blocker use. Given the well-established cardiovascular safety, affordability, and broad clinical availability, beta-blockers may serve as promising adjuncts for comprehensive colorectal cancer treatment. However, further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and define optimal patient populations, timing, and combination strategies. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251079257).

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBeta-blockerscancer-specific mortalitycolorectal cancermeta-analysisoverall survivalprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID41309043
PMCPMC12663069

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.