Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309477›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Evaluating pain and neurological function with high frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: design of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (PDN-Sensory).

Rodica Pop-Busui, Erika A Petersen, Brian L Levy, Solomon Tesfaye, David G Armstrong, George Grunberger, Andrew Jm Boulton, Manish Bharara, Deborah Edgar, Rose Province Azalde and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05777317 (PDN-SENSORY), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05777317 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

PDN-SENSORY: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Pain and Neurological Function With 10 kHz SCS in Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNevro CorpRan2023 to 2026Enrolled143ConditionsPainful Diabetic NeuropathyArms10 kHz SCS, CMM alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rodica Pop-BusuiOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Erika A PetersenUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA eapetersen@uams.edu.
Brian L LevyNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Solomon TesfayeDiabetes Research Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
David G ArmstrongDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
George GrunbergerGrunberger Diabetes Institute, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA.
Andrew Jm BoultonDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester - The Victoria University of Manchester Campus, Manchester, UK.
Manish BhararaNevro Corp, Redwood City, California, USA.
Deborah EdgarCommexus Ltd, Dunblane, UK.
Rose Province AzaldeNevro Corp, Redwood City, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-5680
David CarawayNevro Corp, Redwood City, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent pharmacological treatment options for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) often fail to provide adequate pain relief. However, in the recent SENZA-PDN study, high-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) demonstrated significant long-term improvements in lower limb pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a PDN population. Furthermore, more than half of 10 kHz SCS recipients showed improved sensory function based on non-blinded clinical assessments in post hoc analysis. We report the design of the PDN-Sensory study, which aims to evaluate changes in pain and neurological function with 10 kHz SCS in the treatment of PDN. The study will include objective measures of neurological function, including the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS) and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial will compare conventional medical management (CMM) with 10 kHz SCS+CMM in individuals with diabetes and chronic, intractable lower limb pain due to PDN. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to CMM alone or 10 kHz SCS+CMM, with optional crossover at 6 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants at 6 months achieving ≥50% pain relief from baseline. The key secondary endpoint is the proportion of participants at 6 months with a reduction in mTCNS of ≥3 points from baseline (excluding changes in foot pain). Additional endpoints at 6 and 12 months include changes from baseline in mTCNS, IENFD, 7-day averaged pain score, pain-related interference, HRQoL, sleep, psychological outcomes, functional status and metabolic parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol received central approval from the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB #20230954). Local IRB approval will be required before initiation of the study at each participating clinical site. The study complies with Good Clinical Practice guidelines (ISO 14155), the Declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable national, federal and local regulatory requirements. Dissemination plans include presentations at national and international conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal with open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05777317.

Indexed as

Diabetic NeuropathiesPain ManagementSpinal Cord StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeChronic PainClinical ProtocolsDiabetic neuropathyPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID41309477
PMCPMC12666230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.