ArticleNature communications2025
A scalable reinforcement learning approach for screening large peptide libraries for bioactive peptide discovery.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in multimodal foundation model-enabled peptide screening and optimization for smart biomaterials and functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioactive peptides such as anticancer peptides (ACPs) offer a promising therapeutic alternative to small molecules due to their efficiency and selectivity against tumors and minimal toxicity towards healthy human cells. However, their rational discovery requires navigating a vast chemical space using computationally demanding in silico tools. Herein, we present a computational method enabling cost-efficient exploration of large peptide libraries using reinforcement learning and posterior sampling. Practical application of the developed approach results in identification of membranolytic peptides with therapeutic potential. The developed computational method reduces the search space by over 90% compared to exhaustive library screening and enables effective balancing between dataset's exploration and exploitation. We demonstrate the scalability of this method by screening a focused library of 36 million structurally resolved helical peptides curated from the Protein Data Bank. When screened in in vitro assays, 15 of the top 100 selected candidates exhibit cytotoxic activity against breast cancer cells including drug resistant triple-negative breast cancer, with the three lead compounds further characterizing as non-toxic towards healthy human cells. This study highlights the potential of using deep reinforcement learning to expedite bioactive peptide discovery, offering a promising path for developing new peptide-based cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.