Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309707›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Brain power comparison between microgravity and head-down tilt bed rest: an electroencephalography approach.

María Sevilla-García, Adrián Quivira-Lopesino, Pablo Cuesta, Sandra Pusil, Ricardo Bruña, Patrique Fiedler, Fernando Maestu, Ana Maria Cebolla, Guy Cheron, Katharina Brauns and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

María Sevilla-García *Biomedical Imaging Technologies, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Adrián Quivira-Lopesino *Center for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo CuestaCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra PusilCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo BruñaCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Patrique FiedlerInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Fernando MaestuCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Maria CebollaLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Movement Biomechanics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Guy CheronLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Movement Biomechanics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Katharina BraunsCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Physiology, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander C StahnCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Physiology, Berlin, Germany.
Michael E FunkeDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. michael.e.funke@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt 50WB1525European Space Agency AO-2004, 118European Space Agency AO-2009-BRTranslational Research Institute for Space Health (TRISH), United States NNX16AO69A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines neurophysiological changes in microgravity by comparing EEG data from two ground analog 60-day head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR) experiments (ESA/DLR "Cocktail" and "RSL") and the NEUROSPAT experiment in space. The primary objective was to determine whether HDBR could effectively model spaceflight's impact on the human brain's EEG signal. In the HDBR dataset, increases in relative delta (2-4 Hz) (p < 0.01) and theta (4-8 Hz) (p < 0.001) power bands were observed during a two-month HDBR experiment, predominantly in the left temporal and parieto-occipital regions. Conversely, the NEUROSPAT dataset showed a significant increase in beta (12-30 Hz) (p < 0.05) power in the left somatosensory cortex during in-flight conditions, suggesting a potential adaptation to disrupted proprioceptive input and motor control in microgravity. The contrasting findings between the two datasets indicate that while HDBR can simulate some aspects of microgravity, it may not serve as a model for all central nervous system changes, especially those related to proprioception and motor functions. This highlights the need for further research, including larger sample sizes, consistent EEG recording conditions, and integration of additional physiological and cognitive markers to fully understand the effects of prolonged microgravity.

Indexed as

Bed RestBrainElectroencephalographyHead-Down TiltWeightlessnessAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpace FlightWeightlessness SimulationEEGHDBRMicrogravitySpaceflightSpaceflight analogs

Identifiers

PMID41309707
PMCPMC12660935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.