ArticleScientific reports2025
The perception of gender in two allegedly sex-specific body odor compounds MSH and HMHA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3-methyl-3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (MSH) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylhexanoic acid (HMHA) are two allegedly sexually dimorphic compounds present in human sweat. While MSH is more typically found in women, HMHA is more typically found in men. Here we investigated whether it was possible to identify these two compounds as explicitly masculine or feminine. We also investigated whether gender and age differences would suggest a possible role of these compounds in mate preferences. To this end, we analyzed the perceptual ratings of t-shirts impregnated with these odors by 2,716 individuals (62% female) aged between 6 and 90, collected during a one-year museum exhibition. Analyses revealed that only women rated MSH as more feminine than HMHA. However, this effect remained very small and masculinity/femininity ratings were extremely variable among the population. Women also rated both odors as more intense and less pleasant than men. Age-related differences reflected the effect of increasing experience with body odors (familiarity). The loss of olfactory function with age was also reflected by decreased perceived intensity and unpleasantness (for HMHA). Overall, the results are not in favor of a role of MSH and/or HMHA in mate preferences, however they do agree with the known gender and age differences in odor perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.