ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of machine learning models for assessing the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism in cervical cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-empowered, clinically-integrated multiomics research in thrombosis: a call to action.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Contemporary Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism: Evolving Populations and Implications for Management and Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for accurately predicting postoperative VTE risk in these patients. The data of this study retrospectively collected the inpatients of cervical cancer in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Chongqing University from January 2020 to December 2023. We utilized 1,044 observations and six variables to develop seven machine learning (ML) models and selected the best-performing model for assessing postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. The models were evaluated using ROC, PR, and DCA curves, and the prediction of the model's process was explained using SHAP values. Among 1,044 postoperative cervical cancer patients, 82 (7.85%) developed VTE. Seven machine learning algorithms were developed and evaluated, with the random forest (RF) model showing the best overall performance (AUC = 0.852, AUPR = 0.332). Compared with other models, including logistic regression (AUC = 0.767) and XGBoost (AUC = 0.836), the RF model demonstrated superior discrimination, calibration, and generalizability. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the RF model yielded the highest net clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities (5-80%). SHAP analysis revealed that D-dimer, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and age were the most influential variables, indicating their substantial contributions to model prediction. Our study suggests that machine learning algorithms can be practical tools for postoperative VTE risk assessment and can learn from patient characteristics to provide personalized evaluations. The RF model outperformed the other six algorithms evaluated. We developed the final RF model as a user-friendly web tool for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.