ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal trajectories of social isolation and loneliness across the lifespan during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Loneliness as an Interface Between Alzheimer's Disease and Suicidal Behaviour: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Analytic Factor Analysis.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026Pooled it
- Community-based health-focused longitudinal aging studies in East and Southeast Asia: landscape and future directions.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the prolonged Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic persisting through to 2023, social isolation became a major public health concern. Its impacts varied across age groups, but empirical evidence on longitudinal trajectories of social isolation in South Korea remains limited. Thus, this study examined social isolation and loneliness trajectories in South Korea using longitudinal data from three waves (2021-2023) involving 2395 participants aged 15-79. Over that three-year period, social isolation increased steadily. Risk was elevated among middle-aged and older adults, men, those with lower educational attainment, lower income, and more severe depressive symptoms, and residents of urban areas. Rates of increased social isolation demonstrated a nonsignificant difference across age groups. By contrast, loneliness remained stable overall but declined among people in their 40 s, 50 s, and 60 s. Higher loneliness at baseline was associated with middle-age and older age, higher depression and anxiety, lower education and income, and urban residence. Depression predicted both social isolation and loneliness, whereas anxiety was associated only with loneliness. These findings highlight a clear divergence between objective social isolation and subjective loneliness, underscoring the need for age-specific and tailored interventions to effectively address each outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.