Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310083›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Breast density classification using frequency-based features in microwave imaging.

Mehran Taghipour-Gorjikolaie, Banafsheh Khalesi, Bilal Khalid, Navid Ghavami, Mario Badia, Mohammad Ghavami, Gianluigi Tiberi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehran Taghipour-GorjikolaieSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK. mehran.taghipour-gorjikolaie@lsbu.ac.uk.
Banafsheh KhalesiUBT - Umbria Bioengineering Technologies, Perugia, Italy.
Bilal KhalidSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Navid GhavamiUBT - Umbria Bioengineering Technologies, Perugia, Italy.
Mario BadiaUBT - Umbria Bioengineering Technologies, Perugia, Italy.
Mohammad GhavamiSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Gianluigi TiberiSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide. One major challenge in early and accurate detection is breast density. High breast density not only obscures tumors on current imaging modalities, making them harder to identify, but also significantly increases the likelihood of diagnostic errors, both by medical professionals and automated detection systems. As a result, accurately classifying the breast density is crucial, and can lead to better, more tailored screening approaches and reduce the chances of error. This is especially critical for younger women, who are usually excluded from national screenings due to concerns such as radiation exposure. Microwave imaging offers a promising solution to this problem. Unlike traditional imaging methods, it uses safe, non-ionizing radiation, making it suitable for women of all ages. Beyond its safety, microwave imaging has the potential not only to detect breast cancer, but also to classify breasts into high or low density. This dual capability allows for more personalized and accurate cancer detection based on breast density, improving outcomes and reducing diagnostic uncertainty. Our microwave imaging prototype called MammoWave works by scanning the breast using a wide range of low-power electromagnetic signals captured from multiple positions around the breast. This approach provides a rich set of data that helps create an internal map of breast tissue without exposing patients to harmful radiation. This technique makes it possible to extract frequency-based characteristics from both the spatial and spectral domains, taking advantage of not just the signal's magnitude but also its phase information. These rich features can offer deeper insights into tissue composition and improve the accuracy of breast density classification. Our analysis shows that by fusing features from both the magnitude and phase of the signals-and focusing on approximately the first 40 components of the fast Fourier transform (FFT)-it's possible to achieve an accuracy of around 70% in classifying breast density using a support vector machine (SVM) with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. Furthermore, instead of using the full frequency range (1 to 9 GHz), selecting specific sub-bands (1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 GHz) can improve the accuracy to approximately 73%. Importantly, the results also reveal that when breast density is correctly identified and taken into account, the performance of machine learning models in detecting breast cancer improves significantly boosting specificity and sensitivity by around 10% and 5%, respectively for low-density breasts, and by 15% and 10% respectively for high-density breasts.

Indexed as

BreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsMicrowave ImagingFemaleHumansMammographyMicrowavesBreast CancerBreast DensityClassificationFrequency-based FeaturesMachine LearningMicrowave Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41310083
PMCPMC12749067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.