Evidence mapPaperPMID 41310101Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-based AI model for predicting academic success and engagement among physical higher education students.

Chenyang Li, Zhiying Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenyang LiBasic Department, Jiangsu Vocational College of Information Technology, Wuxi, 214153, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiying CaoGraduate School, Dankook University, Gyeonggi-do, 16890, Korea. czy150109@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic achievement and student engagement are essential components of educational success, particularly in physical education (PE) programs, where cognitive and physical competencies intersect. This study introduces HybridStackNet, a stacked ensemble model integrating Random Forest and Support Vector Machine (SVM) as base learners and Logistic Regression as a meta-learner, aimed at jointly predicting academic success and engagement among higher education PE students. The model was trained on a publicly available dataset from Kaggle comprising 500 instances with academic, behavioral, and physical attributes. Preprocessing steps included label encoding, z-score normalization, Random Forest-based feature selection, and SMOTE for class balancing. Using stratified 5-fold cross-validation and GridSearchCV, HybridStackNet demonstrated promising performance (Accuracy = 0.992, Precision = 0.9922, Recall = 0.992, F1-score = 0.9915, AUC = 0.9942, Jaccard = 0.9842, Kappa = 0.9846, and Hamming Loss = 0.008). These results surpassed several baseline models, including Decision Tree, SVM, KNN, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting. Explainability was explored using Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) and LIME. PDPs highlighted key feature impacts (e.g., Attendance_Rate, Overall_PE_Performance_Score, Motivation_Level), while LIME provided interpretable thresholds (e.g., Attendance_Rate [Formula: see text], Speed_Agility_Score [Formula: see text]) for local explanations. HybridStackNet and the accompanying explainability framework offer an interpretable machine learning approach to early performance risk detection in PE education settings.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessDeep LearningPhysical Education and TrainingStudentsHumansSupport Vector MachineAcademic successEnsemble learningExplainable AIPhysical educationStudent engagement

Identifiers

PMID41310101
PMCPMC12749542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.