ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based AI model for predicting academic success and engagement among physical higher education students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations between generative AI use frequency, technology acceptance, attitudes toward AI, and reported learning preference patterns among students in physical education classes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic achievement and student engagement are essential components of educational success, particularly in physical education (PE) programs, where cognitive and physical competencies intersect. This study introduces HybridStackNet, a stacked ensemble model integrating Random Forest and Support Vector Machine (SVM) as base learners and Logistic Regression as a meta-learner, aimed at jointly predicting academic success and engagement among higher education PE students. The model was trained on a publicly available dataset from Kaggle comprising 500 instances with academic, behavioral, and physical attributes. Preprocessing steps included label encoding, z-score normalization, Random Forest-based feature selection, and SMOTE for class balancing. Using stratified 5-fold cross-validation and GridSearchCV, HybridStackNet demonstrated promising performance (Accuracy = 0.992, Precision = 0.9922, Recall = 0.992, F1-score = 0.9915, AUC = 0.9942, Jaccard = 0.9842, Kappa = 0.9846, and Hamming Loss = 0.008). These results surpassed several baseline models, including Decision Tree, SVM, KNN, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting. Explainability was explored using Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) and LIME. PDPs highlighted key feature impacts (e.g., Attendance_Rate, Overall_PE_Performance_Score, Motivation_Level), while LIME provided interpretable thresholds (e.g., Attendance_Rate [Formula: see text], Speed_Agility_Score [Formula: see text]) for local explanations. HybridStackNet and the accompanying explainability framework offer an interpretable machine learning approach to early performance risk detection in PE education settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.