Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310147›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Tactile stimulation reverses painful stimuli outcomes via PVN-VTA oxytocin circuitry and dopaminergic regulation.

Yahan Sun, Wei Qian, Lizi Zhang, Haiwei Niu, Luoman Li, Lu Li, Yiting Zhu, Jiayu Xiao, Jing Liu, Xiao Han and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yahan SunInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Wei QianInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Lizi ZhangInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Haiwei NiuInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Luoman LiInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Lu LiInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Yiting ZhuInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Jiayu XiaoInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Jing LiuInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Xiao HanInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Kaizhe HuangInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Yuting BaiInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Qin AnInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Wenbo ChengInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Laifu LiCollege of Life Sciences and Agriculture, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, China.
Rui JiaInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Zhixiong HeInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China. hezhixiong@snnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2299-6463
Fadao TaiInstitute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China. taifadao@snnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-4179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn mammals often encounter painful stimuli (PS)-such as trampling, retrieval by parental incisors, or conspecific aggression-that can disrupt neural and behavioral development. Parental tactile care, including licking and grooming, is thought to buffer these effects, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using mandarin voles, a highly social species, we showed that postnatal back brushing, a proxy for affiliative tactile stimulation, reversed the negative impact of early tail pinching on emotional and social behaviors. Back brushing notably reversed the reduction in activities of oxytocin (OXT) neurons in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and activities of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) induced by early tail pinching. Chemogenetic and optogenetic activation of PVN-VTA OXT neuron terminals reduced anxiety, increased sociality, and enhanced dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of animals with PS. These effects were reversed by oxytocin receptor (OXTR) antagonism in the VTA. Conversely, inhibition of this circuit produced opposite effects. At the molecular level, brushing reversed PS-induced hypermethylation of Drd1, Drd2, and Nr3c1, as well as broader transcriptomic shifts in the NAc. Our findings uncover a tactile-oxytocin-dopamine pathway underlying resilience to early-life pain and highlight conserved mechanisms through which social touch supports emotional brain development.

Indexed as

DopamineOxytocinPainParaventricular Hypothalamic NucleusTouchVentral Tegmental AreaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornArvicolinaeBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleReceptors, OxytocinSocial BehaviorDopamineOxytocinReceptors, Oxytocin

Identifiers

PMID41310147
PMCPMC12722742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.