ArticleScientific reports2025
Inter-individual variability in the relationship between propulsion force and walking speed in subacute stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking speed is primarily driven by the propulsion force generated during the late stance phase, but the translation of propulsion force to walking speed may differ across individuals. This study aimed to investigate inter-individual variability in the relationship between propulsion force and walking speed in patients with subacute stroke and identify the clinical characteristics associated with this variability. Twenty-five participants with subacute stroke performed walking trials at self-selected and highest possible speeds. We applied hierarchical linear modeling, which allows the estimation of both group-level effects and individual-level variations, to determine whether adding individual's regression coefficients for propulsion forces improved the model fit. The association between an individual's regression coefficient and their clinical characteristics was examined using Bayesian network analysis. The results showed meaningful inter-individual variability in the effect of the propulsion force on walking speed. A probabilistic association from the Trunk Impairment Scale to the regression coefficients of paretic propulsion force (r = - 0.42) and another from the regression coefficients of non-paretic propulsion force to paretic propulsion force (r = - 0.48) were observed. Individuals with reduced trunk function may tend to rely more on paretic propulsion to maintain walking speed. These patient-specific propulsion patterns may facilitate the development of effective rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.