ReviewMikrochimica acta2025
Nano-engineered biomimetic materials: toward point-of-care diagnosis of infectious diseases.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review emphasizes the advantages of nano-engineered antibodies (nanobodies), nanozymes, and nano-imprinted polymers (nano-MIPs) in point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for infectious diseases, with a particular emphasis on SARS-CoV-2 detection, compared to conventional receptors. Infectious diseases have led to significant economic and social challenges, prompting the urgent development of reliable and cost-effective diagnostic tools, particularly POC biosensors. Current POC biosensors utilizing enzymes and antibodies have proven useful, although limitations such as low sensitivity, stability, and complex fabrication affect their performance. With advancements in nanomaterials, biomimetic elements such as nanobodies, nanozymes, and nano-MIPs they have shown great potential as alternatives to natural receptors. Recent advances in these biomimetic element materials applied to POC sensing platforms, such as paper-based devices and microfluidics, as the physical platforms are reviewed and discussed. This work also highlights the integration of electrochemical and optical detection systems with novel readout technologies, including smartphone-based devices, and represents an updated overview that encompasses all the advancements in this domain. Emphasis is placed on COVID-19 as a pivotal case study. Key primary sensor performances, such as linear detection range and limit of detection, are evaluated and compared. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed to illustrate the potential impact of these nano-based materials on future biosensor applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41310207What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.