ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Head-to-head Comparison of Multimodal Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection and Local Staging with Whole-mount Histopathology Reference.European urology oncology · 2026Article
- Micro-ultrasound in the Canadian prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnostic workflow for prostate cancer detection has evolved substantially with advances in imaging technologies and biopsy techniques. Currently, MRI is the standard modality for prostate imaging in cancer detection. However, the rising incidence of prostate cancer and the limited accessibility and high cost of MRI created a growing need for more cost- and time-effective alternative imaging modalities. Micro-ultrasound (microUS), which enables prostatic ductal anatomy to be imaged with a 70-micron resolution, provides an alternative. Level 1 evidence currently shows the non-inferiority of microUS in detecting Grade Group ≥2 prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men compared with MRI. Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate microUS in various other indications. Inter-reader variability needs to be optimized, possibly through the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41310306What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.