ArticleBMC primary care2025
Variations in social care need reporting amongst GP practices in England: a retrospective cohort study in people with multimorbidity.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultimorbidity, the presence of multiple chronic health conditions, presents significant challenges in both health and social care settings. Addressing social care needs, such as assistance with daily activities and support for managing finances, is crucial in care management patients with multimorbidity. However, variability in the documentation and reporting of these needs remains poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify the variations in social care need (SCN) reporting across GP practices in England.
methodsWe conducted a population-based study using electronic health records from a national sample of 873,092 individuals with multimorbidity. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to determine the final cohort, with demographic and clinical data extracted. We analysed SCN reporting rates at the practice level, using interquartile ranges (IQRs) and intra-class coefficients (ICCs) to assess variability. Factors influencing SCN reporting were examined, including long-term conditions, demographic variables, and socio-economic deprivation.
resultsSignificant variability was observed in SCN reporting across GP practices. Outcomes related to mobility and residential needs showed the greatest differences in reporting rates. Moderate correlations were observed between certain SCN categories, such as mobility and activities of daily living, as well as disability and financial needs. Patients with long-term conditions, such as dementia and multiple sclerosis, were more likely to have their SCNs reported, while other multimorbidity conditions showed lower reporting rates. Demographic factors, including gender and socio-economic deprivation, were associated with higher reporting rates, particularly for females and patients in more deprived areas.
conclusionsThis study highlights the significant variability in the documentation of social care needs across healthcare practices, using electronic health records in a large population-based sample. The findings emphasise the need for standardised reporting practices to ensure comprehensive care for individuals with multimorbidity, particularly those from more deprived socio-economic backgrounds and with complex care needs. Improved reporting could enhance care coordination and reduce health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.