Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41310510›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2025

The efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on anxiety, depression, and sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jialin Zhang, Linqing Zhu, Qing Meng, Zuxing Wang, Hongru Zhu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jialin ZhangMental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Linqing ZhuMental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Qing MengMental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zuxing WangSichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China. zuxingwang7090@163.com.
Hongru ZhuMental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. zhuhongru@wchscu.cn.

Funding

Clinical Research Innovation Project from West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2019HXCX03National Science Foundation of China 82171513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the growing recognition of the limitations associated with conventional treatments for anxiety and depression, there has been increasing interest in alternative and adjunct therapies, particularly probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. However, current research results regarding their efficacy in treating anxiety, depression, and sleep have been inconsistent.

methodsA systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to October 2023, updated in March 2025. The included studies involved individuals with anxiety and depression disorders, or chronic disease patients/healthy populations presenting with depressive or anxiety symptoms. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data synthesis and subgroup analyses were performed in Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software. The anxiety, depression, and sleep scores were calculated by the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsA total of 72 RCTs were included (3,319 intervention and 2,778 control participants). Among these, researchers examined depression in 63 studies (2,880 and 2,493 participants) and anxiety in 49 studies (2,124 and 1,788 participants) using probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics interventions, while 12 studies (411 and 378 participants) examined sleep using probiotic interventions. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions compared to placebo in depression (SMD = − 0.53, 95% CI: −0.67 to − 0.39, Z = 7.33, P < 0.001) and anxiety (SMD = − 0.44, 95% CI: −0.59 to − 0.28, P < 0.001). Additionally, probiotics were shown to improve sleep quality (SMD = − 0.39, 95% CI: −0.53 to − 0.25, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that both probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics independently alleviated anxiety and depression. The impact of probiotics varied by population, intervention duration, and probiotic types.

conclusionThese findings suggest that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics offer promising adjunctive treatments for anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. However, given the high heterogeneity and limited methodological quality of the included studies, further large-scale and high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to further validate these outcomes. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42024563862). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionPrebioticsProbioticsSleep Wake DisordersSynbioticsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepPrebioticsAnxietyDepressionMeta-analysisPrebioticsProbioticsSleepSynbioticsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41310510
PMCPMC12751681

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.