ArticleMalaria journal2025
Knowledge, attitudes, practices and determinants of mosquito repellent use for malaria prevention in Nangabo Ward, Wakiso District, Uganda.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite their potential to complement and enhance malaria prevention, mosquito repellents remain underutilized in endemic regions like Uganda, where outdoor transmission and insecticide resistance threaten current interventions. This study assessed the Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices (KAP), and determinants of mosquito repellent use for malaria prevention in Nangabo Ward, Wakiso district, Uganda.
methodsA cross-sectional mixed-methods study was used among 185 household heads or their adult representatives, selected through simple random sampling. A pretested semi-structured questionnaire gathered quantitative data, alongside in-depth interviews from 15 purposively selected participants. Quantitative analysis was conducted using Stata MP V14, while qualitative content analysis utilized Atlas.ti 14. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to evaluate the associations between variables.
resultsThe study found that while 63.8% of the participants were aware of repellents, and 59.5% had Positive attitudes towards them, there was low consistent use of only 8.2%. Although over 77.3% reported ever using mosquito repellents, occasional use was reported to be at 44.9%. Additionally, significant knowledge gaps existed, with only 38.4% of respondents understanding that repellents were safe for children under 5 years old, and 35.7% for pregnant women. Key barriers included cost (36.8%, affordability, and policy gaps (91.9% unaware of regulations). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age 60 years and above was strongly associated with non-use (AOR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.43-4.38, P = 0.001), while heads of households with tertiary education 58% were more likely to use (AOR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.79, P = 0.007). Similarly, large households (8-10 members) were less likely to use mosquito repellents (AOR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.28-5.24, P = 0.008). Positive attitudes increased the likelihood of repellent use (AOR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.15-9.34, p = 0.036). Positive attitudes increased the likelihood of repellent use (AOR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.15-9.34, p = 0.036). Qualitative insights continued to emphasize the barriers to mosquito repellent use and highlighted a strong community preference for natural repellent options over synthetic ones.
conclusionWhile awareness and attitudes towards repellents were generally positive, usage was low due to high costs, limited availability, and inadequate government support. A significant link was found between age, education, household size, and repellent use. Qualitative data showed a preference for natural repellents, suggesting the integration of these products into the Uganda National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) with subsidies and community education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.