ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Automatic multi-IMU-based deep learning evaluation of intensity during static standing balance training exercises.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective balance rehabilitation requires training at an appropriate level of exercise intensity given an individual's needs and abilities. Typically balance intensity is assessed through in-clinic visual observation by physical therapists (PTs), which limits the ability to monitor and progress intensity during home-based components of training programs. The goal of this study was to train and evaluate machine learning models for estimating physical therapists' perceived balance exercise intensity using data from full-body wearable sensors to support the development of home-based training exercise dosage monitoring.
methodsBalance exercise participants (n = 47) participated in a single-day balance training session where they were filmed performing static standing exercises at various levels of intensity. Kinematic data from 13 full-body wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and self-ratings of balance intensity were also collected. An additional cohort of PT participants (n = 42) was recruited to watch the videos of the balance exercise participants and provide ratings of balance intensity. The mean PT rating for each video was used as a ground truth (GT) label of balance intensity. We trained and evaluated Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-based models to predict balance intensity based on performance as captured through the IMUs. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of predications. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the effect of the number of IMUs used on model performance.
resultsModels trained on orientation derived from all 13 IMUs achieved good predictive performance as indicated by a RMSE of 0.66 [0.62, 0.69], which was within the threshold defined by typical inter-rater variabilities between PTs (RMSE of 0.74 [0.72, 0.76]). Sensitivity analysis indicated that model performance stabilized at four sensors with the best performance corresponding to sensors placed on both thighs and the lower and upper back.
conclusionsFindings from this study indicated that balance intensity assessment can be achieved through wearable sensors and a CNN model, which could support the supervision and effectiveness of home-based balance rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.