ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
The duality of the BBB: breaking the myth of the blood-brain barrier breakdown.
Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neuroimmune-glutamate hypothesis of addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- The Role of Hydrogen Bond Donors and Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Modulating Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability: Implications for CNS Drug Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of YJ-2 as a PAD4 Inhibitor in Alleviating Ischemic Brain Injury: From NETs-Induced Neurotoxicity to In Vivo Neuroprotection.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Transport pathways across the blood-brain barrier for waste clearance and drug delivery.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Review
- Beyond Amyloids: Neuroprotective Potential of Betanin and its Derivatives Against Alpha-Synuclein Aggregates and ROS Overload in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- Nitric Oxide Donor Alleviates Cardiac Arrest Induced Blood Brain Barrier Injury by Inhibiting HMGB1-ATG5 Mediated Endothelial Autophagy.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Research on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has greatly evolved over the past 20 years, with growing recognition of its role as a multicellular complex regulating brain homeostasis. Previously confined to pharmaceutical sciences, the BBB has now become a growing focus of interest for neuroscientists and clinicians. However, the word ‘barrier’, implying something that can be broken, opened, or disrupted, can lead to confusion when one tries to relate this concept to its underlying cell biology. Here, echoing the fundamental question posed by Lina Stern when she first defined the BBB in 1921, I suggest that the confusion stems from conflating the physicochemical properties intrinsic to the barrier with the living biological multicellular interface. Notwithstanding its complexity, the BBB is now often simplistically portrayed as “permeable”, particularly in the context of prevalent diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, depression, multiple sclerosis, or stroke. Such overly simplified concepts promoted over the past two decades have led to misconceptions that hinder a proper understanding of the BBB, affecting both the general public and seasoned scientists. This misunderstanding is not without harmful clinical impact as many interpret the BBB as something that often breaks, leading to a massive entry of drugs and other blood-borne compounds into the brain, which is very rarely the case. After outlining the likely causes of these misconceptions and trying to define the concepts of “BBB permeability” and “brain bioavailability”, I offer several recommendations: (1) more frequent use of quantitative methods involving small hydrophilic compounds to measure BBB integrity; (2) avoid terms such as ‘BBB disruption,’ ‘opening,’ or ‘breakdown,’ and instead favor terms like ‘dysfunction’ or, where appropriate, ‘leakage’, essentially when describing biological defects assessed by changes in large molecule localization; and (3) always account for the dual nature of the BBB, as both a physicochemical barrier and a living biological interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.