ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2025
Inhalation toxicity of arsenic-containing mine dust in an air-liquid interface bronchial epithelial model.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Metal Mixtures and C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Study Based on Occupational Populations in China.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTin mine dust (MD), a by-product of tin mining and rock drilling, is a significant contributor to miners' pneumoconiosis. This aerosolized dust is a complex mixture of mineral components, including potentially toxic heavy metals such as arsenic, which may contribute to the development of pneumoconiosis and lung cancer. This study investigates the inhalation toxicity of tin MD samples on pulmonary cells using an Air-Liquid Interface (ALI) exposure model.
resultsMD-A was characterized by high arsenic content, exceeding 30%. In contrast, the elemental composition of MD-B and MD-C was predominantly composed of calcium, magnesium, and aluminum. In the toxicity study, key toxicological endpoints (cell viability, cytotoxicity, pro-inflammatory markers, and cell barrier function) were systematically assessed, and real-time monitoring of the cell-delivered MD particles (MD-A, MD-B, MD-C, and silica) concentrations was achieved using QCM. MD-A significantly enhanced the proliferation ability of 16HBE and Calu-3 cells compared to other particulate matters, indicating arsenic-containing MD promotes cell proliferation. MD-A resulted in an increase in IL-1β mRNA expression in 16HBE cells; elevations in IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and CCL2 mRNA were observed in Calu-3 cells. Additionally, treatment with four different particles significantly increased the mRNA expression of MUC5AC in both cell types. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated alterations in the typical morphology of epithelial cells exposed to arsenic-containing MD and silica particles. In this study, it was shown that four types of particles delivered via suspension to the same in vitro model can induce differing levels of cytotoxicity and proinflammatory responses. The differences in results underscore the specific effects of the inherent physicochemical attributes of particles on biological interactions.
conclusionsUnder identical particle size conditions, in vitro studies on inhalation toxicity reveal that the chemical composition of particulate matter causes varying degrees of toxic damage to cells. This study utilizes an advanced in vitro method to assess the inhalation hazards of tin MD particles by integrating the ALICE system. The chemical complexity of tin MD, particularly its significant arsenic content, requires special attention and thorough evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.