ReviewBiomarker research2025
From multi-omics to deep learning: advances in cfDNA-based liquid biopsy for multi-cancer screening.
Review in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns as Biomarkers for Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers: A Systematic Review of Methodological Diversity and Diagnostic Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the path to clinical implementation of multi-omics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Advances in Brain Tumor Biomarkers: From Molecular Profiling to Liquid Biopsy and AI-Driven Detection.Cancers · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Future Perspectives Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review of Novel Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Combining circulating tumor cell and circulating cell-free DNA analyses broadens clinical applicability of liquid biopsy in high grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Tumor Genomics and Liquid Biopsy in Cancer Biology: From Static Snapshots to Dynamic Measurements.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Epigenetic profiling of circulating cell-free DNA for early detection and minimal residual disease assessment in lung cancer: a focus on DNA methylation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Editorial: New advancement in tumor microenvironment remodeling and cancer therapy, volume II.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with early detection being critical for improving survival rates. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as tissue biopsies and imaging, face limitations in invasiveness, cost, and accessibility, making liquid biopsy a compelling non-invasive alternative. Among liquid biopsy approaches, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis has gained prominence for its ability to capture tumor-derived genetic and epigenetic alterations. This review summarizes key cfDNA biomarkers, including gene mutations, copy number variations (CNVs), DNA methylation, fragmentation patterns, and end motifs (EMs), and highlights their utility in cancer detection and monitoring. By integrating these multi-modal cfDNA biomarkers, feature fusion approaches have not only enhanced the performance of cancer classification models but also stabilized low-abundance signals, thus ensuring more reliable cancer detection and monitoring. Furthermore, the diagnostic power of cfDNA analysis has been further amplified by machine learning (ML), with both traditional ML and deep learning (DL) methods demonstrating strong predictive performance in routine clinical liquid biopsy applications. However, challenges remain, including tumor heterogeneity, standardization of data processing, model explainability, and cost constraints. Future advancements should focus on refining multi-modal feature integration, developing explainable AI (XAI) models, and optimizing cost-effective strategies to enhance clinical applicability. As computational methodologies advance, the integration of cfDNA biomarkers with ML frameworks holds great promise to reshape non-invasive cancer detection by enabling earlier diagnostics, more accurate prognostic evaluation and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.