Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41311486›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Evaluation of serological assays for

Sara Giovannozzi, Alessandra Martucciello, Mercedes Domínguez Rodríguez, Inmaculada Moreno Iruela, Mery Boifava, Lorena Schiavo, Anna Viscito, Giovanni Parisio, Nicoletta Vitale, Javier Bezos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara Giovannozzi *National Reference Centre for Bovine Tuberculosis (CNR-bTB), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna (IZSLER), Brescia, Italy.
Alessandra Martucciello *Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technologies of Water Buffalo Farming and Productions, Salerno, Italy.
Mercedes Domínguez RodríguezUnidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada Moreno IruelaUnidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Mery BoifavaNational Reference Centre for Bovine Tuberculosis (CNR-bTB), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna (IZSLER), Brescia, Italy.
Lorena SchiavoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technologies of Water Buffalo Farming and Productions, Salerno, Italy.
Anna ViscitoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technologies of Water Buffalo Farming and Productions, Salerno, Italy.
Giovanni ParisioNational Reference Centre for Bovine Tuberculosis (CNR-bTB), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna (IZSLER), Brescia, Italy.
Nicoletta VitaleIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Torino, Italy.
Javier BezosAnimal Health Department of Veterinary Faculty and VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Esterina De CarloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, National Reference Centre for Hygiene and Technologies of Water Buffalo Farming and Productions, Salerno, Italy.
Maria Beatrice BoniottiNational Reference Centre for Bovine Tuberculosis (CNR-bTB), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna (IZSLER), Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bovine tuberculosis (TB) in water buffalo ( Methods: This study analyzed 895 serum samples from water buffaloes, including 393 from TB-free herds and 502 from TB-infected herds. Animals from TB-free herds were tested using IDT and an ELISA assay, whereas those from infected herds were also tested using IGRA. We developed an ELISA assay targeting MPB70, MPB83, ESAT6, CFP10, PPDB, and P22 antigens to investigate the role of the humoral response in TB diagnosis. Results and discussion: The ELISA showed a specificity of 98.2%. However, sensitivity differed based on the antigen used: among the most reactive proteins, sensitivity was 67.5% for MPB70, 69.8% for P22, and 74.4% for PPDB. Moreover, approximately 70% of samples with discordant IDT and IGRA results, as well as those with positive IDT but inconclusive IGRA results, tested positive by serology, highlighting the potential of antibody-based detection to improve TB diagnosis in buffaloes. Our findings suggest that integrating serological testing with standard diagnostic methods could enhance the detection of infected animals, ultimately contributing to better TB control in buffalo populations.

Indexed as

diagnosisELISAMycobacterium bovisP22PPDBtuberculosiswater buffalo

Identifiers

PMID41311486
PMCPMC12646987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.