SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Association between prognostic nutritional index and the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emerging data suggest a correlation between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Despite these findings, the overall conclusions remain inconclusive. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period to October 31, 2024, Examining the relationship between PNI and clinical outcomes in AMI patients. The outcomes included mortality due to acute myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury. These outcomes were using hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were used to assess the stability of the results and potential sources of heterogeneity. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.0. Results: Our analysis included twelve retrospective cohort studies and two prospective studies. Demonstrated a correlation between PNI values and mortality (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.91-0.85; Conclusion: PNI has a strong link to lower mortality rates in patients with AMI, higher the PNI values correspond to lower mortality risk. No significant relationship between PNI and MACE was observed. PNI could be an important factor in individualized managenent of AMI patients in clinical settings. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024620983.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.