ArticleJournal of otology2025
Subjective visual vertical in first time seafarers experiencing sea sickness.
Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Sea sickness, a form of motion sickness, is a common condition among sailors on various sailing vessels, primarily due to their roll and pitch movements. While the exact neurobiological mechanisms remain unclear, the most widely accepted explanation is the sensory conflict theory Methods: This observational study was conducted on board a naval frigate and involved two groups. The case group consisted of 50 newly recruited sailors experiencing their first sea voyage. The SVV test was conducted at three time points: prior to embarkation Results: Analysis of the SVV test data from the 50 newly recruited sailors (case group) demonstrated a statistically significant difference compared to the control group of experienced sailors. During an active episode of sea sickness, the case group exhibited a notable tilt and deviation in SVV angles, indicating altered verticality perception. These deviations reduced significantly 24 hours post-disembarkation, suggesting an improvement in verticality perception once the motion stimulus was removed. Conclusion: This distinctive study assessed otolith-mediated verticality perception using the SVV test in first-time seafarers experiencing sea sickness aboard a naval frigate. Our findings emphasize the functional importance of the otolith organs in maintaining spatial orientation during maritime motion exposure. The observed SVV deviations support the subjective vertical conflict theory, highlighting the role of vestibular-visual mismatch in the development of sea sickness. However, our findings more likely reflect transient functional disturbance or overstimulation rather than a pre-existing utricular asymmetry alone. Based on the pattern of SVV deviation and recovery, we propose that the utricle may play a more significant role than the saccule in inducing sea sickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.