ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Prognostic Impact of Lesion-Specific Hemodynamic Index and Disease Characteristics in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Diastolic Hyperemia-Free Ratio and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (PRIME-DFRiFR).
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of diastolic hyperemia-free ratio (DFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) before and after lesions in the distal coronary artery. Methods: The PRIME-DFRiFR Study was a single-center, prospective, observational study that evaluated DFR and iFR at points distal and proximal to lesions in distal coronary vessels after angiography and successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Target lesions with diameter stenosis of 50% to 70% were selected, and DFR and iFR were evaluated from the vessel distal point, the lesion distal point, the lesion proximal point, and the vessel proximal point, respectively. Results: Thirty patients (23 males [76.7%]; age 70.6 ± 10.2 years) were enrolled between August 2022 and December 2023, with a total of 37 single intermediate coronary lesions, clinical manifestations of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, dilated cardiomyopathy, or syncope. The DFR and iFR values at the vessel distal point, lesion distal point, lesion proximal point, and vessel proximal point were 0.95 ± 0.06 and 0.94 ± 0.05, 0.96 ± 0.05 and 0.95 ± 0.05, 0.99 ± 0.03 and 0.99 ± 0.03, and 1.00 ± 0.01 and 1.00 ± 0.02, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients of the four point values were 0.894, 0.834, 0.667 and 0.632, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The significant positive correlations indicate that DFR can show relevant pressure changes before and after lesions in a comparable manner to iFR. In this study, the biggest influencing factor for discordance between DFR and iFR was old myocardial infarction. Post-PCI results indicated that DFR wires appeared to maintain relatively good maneuverability with comparable accuracy to iFR wires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.