ArticleHRB open research2025
Understanding the Mechanisms that Operate within CHIME: A Realist Review Protocol.
Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recovery originated from the civil rights movement of the 1960s/70s. However, no universally accepted definition of recovery had been constructed until 1993 when William A. Anthony suggested that recovery involved living one's best life even with mental health difficulties. In 2011, Leamy Methods: This review forms work package one of a PhD study into CHIME and mental health recovery in Ireland. It complies with relevant guidelines relating to realist reviews including Pawson Discussion & Implications for Practice: This proposed review will address a gap in the literature on the mechanism involved in recovery from mental health challenges. Unlike other review types, a realist review is theory orientated, allowing one to answer this review question by exploring how, why, and through what circumstances individuals reach recovery through CHIME. This review will inform future work packages of this PhD study. The proposed review will be written up and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Dissemination outside academia will be considered. Registration ID: CRD420251038961.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.