ArticleCureus2025
A Retrospective Pilot Study to Evaluate the Radiographic Prognosis of Calcified Carotid Atherosclerosis Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarotid atherosclerosis has been used to measure the risk for heart disease and stroke. With the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), dentists can diagnose them earlier if the area is calcified. This study aims to assess the radiographic prognosis of calcified carotid atherosclerosis over time.
methodsA retrospective pilot study including 50 patients with multiple CBCT scans was conducted. Two parameters were used to assess the prognosis of the calcification:(1) involvement of a new anatomical location on the second scan; and (2) a novel use of calcium scoring system by measuring the Agatston score (AGS), volume score, and density score utilizing CBCT data.
resultsOut of 50 patients, there were 28 (56%) females and 22 (44%) males. The mean age was 71±7.42. A slight increase in the number, size, and anatomical area of calcification was noted. There was a significant difference between the AGS on the left side and the volume score, P=0.0403, on the right side. The mean value of all scores on the second scan was higher than on the first.
conclusionsOur study evaluated the progression of calcified carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic patients undergoing multiple CBCT scans. The findings indicate that there was a slight increase in the number, size, and anatomical area of calcification over time. Additionally, the introduction of a calcium scoring system allowed for more comprehensive assessment using the AGS, volume score, and density score derived from CBCT scan data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.