ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Pharmacist prescriber implementation in the experiences of general practitioners, pharmacist prescribers and patients: qualitative study based on pilot trial in Slovenia.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond prescriptions: an analysis of patient journey, self-management adherence, and unmet needs in type 2 diabetes.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Risk-managed antidepressant prescribing in primary care mental health: what pharmacogenetics can (and cannot) deliver.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medication review services have been nationally implemented in Slovenia, and a pilot program for pharmacist prescribing has already been conducted. Qualitative evidence is required to support its integration into healthcare systems. Aim: The aim was to explore the experiences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and clinical pharmacist prescribers regarding the national pilot trial and possible implementation of pharmacist prescribing in Slovenia. Methods: A qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews was applied. A working group developed and piloted the interview guide. Pharmacist prescribers, GPs, and patients involved in a pharmacist prescribing pilot trial in Slovenia were invited via email. Recruitment continued until data saturation was achieved. Purposive sampling was used for recruitment. Interviews were conducted between May and August 2025, recorded, and transcribed in MAXQDA. Data were analysed thematically using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The research team agreed upon final coding. The COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist was applied to ensure methodological rigour. Results: Seventeen participants were interviewed: four pharmacist prescribers, five patients, and eight GPs. Across all groups, participants expressed positive experiences with integrating pharmacist prescribers into the Slovenian healthcare system. Patients valued enhanced monitoring by clinical pharmacists and perceived improved quality of prescribing and clinical outcomes. GPs highlighted effective collaboration, particularly through medication review, as a foundation for pharmacist prescribing. Pharmacist prescribers reported professional satisfaction with monitoring and prescribing responsibilities. GPs and pharmacist prescribers expressed satisfaction with the collaborative practice agreement (CPA) developed in Slovenia and considered dependent prescribing the most appropriate model for initial implementation. Reported barriers included the absence of legislation, reimbursement mechanisms, and structured education. Both pharmacist prescribers and GPs emphasised the need for additional competencies for pharmacist prescribers in Slovenia. Conclusion: This is the first qualitative study examining a pharmacist prescribing pilot outside Anglo-Saxon countries based on experiences from a real national pilot. Findings indicate positive experiences among stakeholders and support for implementation of pharmacist prescriber in Slovenia, with implications for broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.