ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Concerns from bench and insights from bedside: the puzzle of Roxadustat in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VAV2 drives glycolytic reprogramming in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via EIF3F-mediated MTA1 deubiquitination.Cancer & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), is indicated for the treatment of renal anemia. Its therapeutic mechanism involves stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIF-α), thereby stimulating erythropoietin production and regulating iron metabolism. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that Roxadustat exhibits efficacy comparable to that of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). However, preclinical studies demonstrate HIF-1α activation promotes tumor progression via multiple pathways (metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, metastasis, apoptosis resistance, immune evasion, chemoresistance). Current evidence shows no increased malignancy risk with Roxadustat in renal patients. However, while tumor progression events were reported as treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) in CIA studies, clinical data linking Roxadustat to tumor progression remain limited. Furthermore, the observation periods in these studies have been short. A causal relationship remains unestablished due to the insufficient duration of observation required to adequately assess potential HIF-driven oncogenic risks. Consequently, Roxadustat poses a clinical dilemma: its efficacy in CIA offers a promising ESAs alternative, but its HIF-driven oncogenic potential necessitates long-term safety assessment in cancer patients. Future studies must prioritize longitudinal monitoring to define the benefit-risk profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.