ArticleToxicology reports2025
British anti-Lewisite (BAL) reduces the severity of systemic and local responses of the eye after exposure to the chemical warfare agent surrogate for Lewisite, phenylarsine oxide (PAO).
Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenical ocular toxicity is acute, painful, and aggressive. Although British anti-Lewisite (BAL) is an approved therapy for systemic arsenical toxicity, remedial measure for ocular exposure of arsenicals is still an unmet need. This study evaluated the efficacy of BAL as topical drop for ameliorating the pathogenesis incited by phenylarsine oxide (PAO, surrogate for lewisite), a chemical warfare agent. The binding of BAL to arsenic and calcium and zinc, two essential cellular minerals was determined using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC). Ex vivo, mouse corneas were tested with various concentrations of BAL (0.1 %, 1 %, and 5 %). Injury was induced ex vivo using PAO, 25 µg/5 µL, and rescue was evaluated with 1 % BAL. In-vivo, injury to mouse cornea was induced with PAO 100 µg/5 µL and rescue was evaluated by 1 % BAL. All eyes were assessed for physical symptoms by examination under slit lamp biomicroscope, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), corneal thickness, and histopathological changes. BAL bonded strongly with arsenic but negligibly with calcium and zinc. Ex-vivo cornea, response with 1 % BAL was graded superior to higher concentration. One of eight mice with PAO injury survived versus all survivals in the PAO+BAL group after injury. Topical use of BAL mitigated the exacerbated ocular response exhibited by PAO injury. Histology revealed better preservation of retinal architecture in BAL treated mice. 1 % BAL alleviates PAO induced fatality in mice. The rescue in the posterior segment pathogenesis was remarkable. BAL is a promising decontaminant for ocular arsenical exposure and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.