ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Differences in the dynamic balance function of healthy elementary school students and university students observed with and without the use of a sensor-integrated gamification application.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of NMES Combined with Water-Based Resistance Training on Muscle Coordination in Freestyle Kick Movement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sensor game rehabilitation for children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities-medical care dependent group: feasibility case series study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined differences in the dynamic balance function of healthy elementary school students and university students observed with and without the use of a sensor-integrated gamification application developed for pediatric rehabilitation. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2025. and included a total of 79 participants (43 healthy elementary school students from Fukuoka, Japan; 36 healthy university students from Fukushima, Japan). Measurements were performed using a normal Y-Balance test and a Y-Balance test with a sensor game to encourage slow movements. The sensor sensitivity was set to 0.768 g and 7.53 m/s Results: During the Y-Balance test, all items exhibited no significant interaction effects; however, several outcome measures exhibited main effects. The results of multiple comparison tests indicated different responses between groups attributable to sensor game use. No significant differences in the Y-Balance test items with or without the use of the sensor game for the dominant and non-dominant legs were observed in the university student group. Conversely, in the elementary school student group, the posterolateral scores of the Y-Balance test with the sensor game were significantly lower than those of the normal Y-Balance test. Conclusion: The sensor-integrated gamification application effectively increased task difficulty for healthy elementary school students by encouraging slower movements, leading to decreased dynamic balance function. This effect was not observed among university students. These findings suggest that sensor games may be valuable because they can appropriately adjust the difficulty level of balance exercises among elementary school students in rehabilitation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.