ArticleDigital health
A new method for assessing chronic insomnia: Machine learning-based fusion of TCM observation digital features.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the clinical assessment of chronic insomnia, modern medicine encounters challenges in the widespread adoption of objective assessment methods, such as polysomnography, due to their high costs and complex operational requirements. Therefore, it was crucial to implement objective and varied methods to accurately assess chronic insomnia. Methods: Clinical information was collected from 594 patients diagnosed with chronic insomnia. Their facial and tongue features, as observed through traditional Chinese medicine, were recorded using the tongue face diagnosis analysis-1 instrument and analyzed with the tongue/face diagnosis analysis system. Stepwise-regression analysis, principal component analysis, and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression were employed for variable screening. Ultimately, the classification model for assessing the severity of chronic insomnia was constructed using six supervised machine learning methods: decision trees, neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, logistic regression, and naive Bayes. The model was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, precision, and accuracy. Visualization was conducted with the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explainer and decision curve analysis (DCA), and it was finally calibrated using Platt scaling. Results: A comprehensive evaluation revealed that model 4 exhibited superior performance. This model integrated baseline data, sleep symptoms, and facial features, achieving its highest receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.822. Furthermore, DCA demonstrated that model 4 exhibited significant clinical utility. The SHAP illustrated that among the variables exerting the greatest influence on insomnia, the effects of Ch-Y and CH-G were notably prominent, compared to the conventional PSQI and SAS, followed by Ch-R. Finally, the results of Platt scaling calibration indicated that model 4 exhibited significant improvement post-calibration, with the predicted probabilities closely aligning with the actual probabilities of occurrence. Conclusions: This study emphasized convenient and non-invasive diagnostic methods for investigating specific facial and tongue features associated with chronic insomnia. A classification model for chronic insomnia has been developed through the integration of multiple features, enabling a more accurate assessment of insomnia severity and facilitating advancements in therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.