ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Evidence-based nursing practice of radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To integrate the best available evidence with the clinical practice for nursing care of radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) in patients with head and neck cancer, develop an evidence-based practice protocol, and evaluate its effectiveness in clinical application. Methods: Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework, this study summarized the best available evidence for nursing care of RIOM in patients with head and neck cancer and adapted it to the clinical scenario based on expert opinions. An evidence-based practice protocol was developed by integrating the results of a baseline review and an analysis of barriers to implementation. The protocol was implemented in clinical settings, and its effectiveness was evaluated by assessing changes in outcomes before and after implementation, including nurses' implementation rate of review indicators, the incidence of severe RIOM, oral pain scores, and the onset time of different RIOM grades. Results: After the clinical application of the evidence-based practice, the implementation rate of the 9 review indicators of nurses was significantly improved ( Conclusions: The implementation of an evidence-based practice protocol for the nursing care of RIOM in patients with head and neck cancer could enhance nurses' clinical performance, reduce the incidence of severe RIOM at the end of radiotherapy, alleviate oral pain, and delay the onset of mucositis. It could bridge the gap between evidence and clinical practice and enhance the quality of nursing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.